# Styx stablecoin contract

**URL:** <https://community.simplicity-lang.org/t/styx-stablecoin-contract/48>\
**Category:** Share your projects\
**Created:** [August 6, 2026, 12:26am UTC](https://community.simplicity-lang.org/t/styx-stablecoin-contract/48 "2026-08-06T00:26:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![schoen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b3f665/32.png) [@schoen](https://community.simplicity-lang.org/u/schoen)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2026, 6:21am UTC](https://community.simplicity-lang.org/t/styx-stablecoin-contract/48/7 "2026-09-06T06:21:45Z")

</div>

One thing you might try is [txmanifest](https://community.simplicity-lang.org/t/txmanifest-portable-format-for-wallets-to-call-simplicityhl-contracts-without-custom-code/24) (see [txmanifest cookbook](https://stringhandler.github.io/tx_manifest_book/) and [txmanifest-wallet](https://github.com/stringhandler/txmanifest-wallet/)). Basically, you would write a certain JSON file that describes the details of how to interact with the contract, and then an ever-growing list of Simplicity-compatible wallets would, if their users trusted and imported that JSON file, become able to interact on-chain with instances of the contract.

This is being developed by @stringhandler, and getting Styx to work with it could also expose missing features or rough edges in txmanifest itself. It would be a benefit to our ecosystem to have that kind of feedback.

It doesn’t necessarily address the whole UI or discoverability question, but it might be a great step toward wallet compatibility. (The `txmanifest-wallet` project is not meant to be the only compatible wallet, but rather a reference implementation for experimentation purposes.)

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.simplicity-lang.org/t/styx-stablecoin-contract/48)._